EarthTalk®
by Roddy Scheer & Doug Moss
Dear EarthTalk: What are so-called “green corridors” in cities and how do they help mitigate climate change? -- Peter Q, Boston, MA
Green corridors, or ecological corridors, are strips of vegetation and natural landscape dispersed throughout a city. From simple, street-lined rows of trees to interconnected networks of parks and pathways, these developments provide a flexible, natural solution for the climate effects of urbanization.
One of the most pressing environmental hazards cities face today is the urban heat island effect. Large buildings, expansive roads and other man-made infrastructures absorb more heat than surrounding rural areas, leading to significantly higher temperature levels. When combined with global warming, these uncomfortable living conditions can be very detrimental for urban residents. Local air quality also deteriorates from industrial and transportation pollution. With an expected 68 percent of world population in cities by 2050, according to the U.N., the health situation in urban environments will only grow worse.
Green corridors offer a promising start to mitigating these urban issues, allowing cities to naturally lower temperatures through evapotranspiration, a plant process that releases water vapor to cool the surrounding air. Increased vegetation will also allow more hazardous particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon dioxide (CO2) to be absorbed, reducing greenhouse gas concentration and improving air quality.
Columbia’s second-largest city, Medellín, launched a green corridor initiative in 2016. Since then, environmental planners there added rows of vegetation along the most polluted avenues, maximizing the amount of CO2 intake from their $16.8 million investment. Maurício Correa, a researcher studying environmental engineering at a Colombian University, found that the 8,800 trees planted became effective “green barriers” against particulate matter and reduced average city temperature by two degrees Celsius.
Fighting climate change isn’t the only thing green corridors can do. Historically, wildlife has rarely been welcomed into urban life, experiencing drastic changes in the ecosystem. However, nature-based infrastructure can promote biodiversity and provide animal species with a safe habitat. Green corridors are indeed multi-purpose and flexible. To maximize the limited space in busy cities, green corridors can function as recreational centers, city facilities and much more—all while mitigating climate change.
Green corridors can be an effective solution for any city anywhere. In New York, the Manhattan Waterfront Greenway consists of almost 32 miles of bike path lined with various plant species. Urban “Nature Ways” in Singapore mimic the natural rainforests by incorporating trees with canopies stretching across the roads.
CONTACTS: How Medellin is beating the heat with green corridors, bbc.com/future/article/20230922-how-medellin-is-beating-the-heat-with-green-corridors.
Dear EarthTalk: How do environmentalists feel about RFK Jr.'s oversight of health in the next Trump administration, given his background as an environmental activist lawyer?
When Time named Robert F. Kennedy Jr. one of its early 2000s “Heroes for the Planet,” the outspoken lawyer was a clear choice for the honor, having gained fame during his fight to protect New York City’s water supply. He advocated for “the environment [as] the most important, the most fundamental, civil-rights issue,” according to a 2004 interview. Many of Kennedy’s views can be summarized in the June 18, 2007 issue of Rolling Stone in which he demanded investment into renewable energy sources, blamed America for its “reckless consumption of oil and coal,” and emphasized the need to slow global warming.
Almost twenty years later, as RFK Jr. takes the reins as America’s top health official, the same magazine has quoted former friends, colleagues, and family members calling the former ‘hero’ a “conspiracist” with “dangerous views.” The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), a leading environmental non-profit, used the term “one-man misinformation superspreader” to describe its former Senior Attorney, a statement corroborated by former allies who have stated that Kennedy is not an environmentalist, but a “science denier” and a “conspiracy theorist.”
Even before his endorsement of President Trump, who has famously called climate change a ‘hoax’, environmentalists had begun to turn against Kennedy. Liz Barratt-Brown, a senior adviser for NRDC and Kennedy’s former coworker, told the New York Times that he had begun drifting away from the environmental movement in the early 2000s when he started spreading unproven theories regarding vaccinations, such as linking vaccines to autism without evidence.
Around the same time that RFK Jr. became invested in the anti-vaccine movement, he opposed the construction of the Cape Wind Project, an offshore wind farm in Nantucket Sound that would have provided roughly 75 percent of the electricity used by Cape Cod, Nantucket, and Martha’s Vineyard. Kennedy’s position began as an instance of NIMBYism, or the “not in my backyard” mentality, as he owned a home nearby and had cited unsightly aesthetics as a partial reason for his dissent, and has grown in recent years to staunchly oppose all offshore wind.
While offshore wind farms have several disadvantages, they are also a promising source of clean energy; thus, Kennedy’s opposition sparked disdain from climate activists like Bill McKibben who claim “he could have used his name and platform” to promote renewable energy. Furthermore, many of Kennedy’s reasons for opposition have been proven repeatedly to be rumors. For example, in January 2023, Kennedy adamantly promoted the idea that offshore wind is killing whales despite the claim having been proven unfounded by a variety of organizations including by the Federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
Once a “hero for the planet,” many environmentalists now echo Dan Reicher, a former peer and colleague of RFK Jr. and a Stanford University senior energy researcher: “Stay very far away from today’s RFK Jr. if you’re interested in environmental protection.” RFK Jr. has told the Washington Post that he believes he can help sway President Trump’s environmental policies. Environmentalists are “deeply skeptical,” as less than one month into office Trump has withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords and dismantled a series of environmental policies and funding. It remains to be seen whether the Secretary of Health is successful in turning the tides of the environmental movement back in his favor.
CONTACTS: Fresh Water: Let Rivers Run Deep, https://time.com/archive/6736055/fresh-water-let-rivers-run-deep/; RFK Jr.’s ‘Sad’ Slide From Environmental Hero to Outcast, https://insideclimatenews.org/news/22092024/robert-f-kennedy-jr-environmental-hero-to-outcast/.
Dear EarthTalk: How is the environmental advocacy community in the U.S. gearing up for a second term of Trump in the White House? -- Peggy L., Washington, DC
As Trump begins his second term, green groups are bracing for policies favoring fossil fuels and loose regulations. With appointments like North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum as Interior Secretary and oil industry CEO Chris Wright as Energy Secretary, many expect expanded drilling and reduced federal land protections. Burgum supports more domestic oil production, which could slow a shift to renewables.
Environmental groups are preparing legal challenges to harmful policies. Earthjustice, the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) have strong histories of successful lawsuits. Brett Hartl, CBD’s government affairs director, warns of “aggressiveness and disregard for the rule of law.” These groups plan to defend climate policies, air and water quality, and environmental justice programs. Another concern is Project 2025, a conservative policy framework likely to guide Trump’s administration. It aims to roll back clean energy initiatives and climate policies. Andrew Wetzler, head of NRDC’s nature program, noted that several Project 2025 contributors have already been appointed, reinforcing fears of cuts to emissions regulations and clean energy funding.
Federal lands and national monuments, such as Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, may again face reduced protections. Trump tried similar rollbacks in his first term, and groups like the Grand Canyon Trust are ready to fight new efforts. Executive Director Ethan Aumack asserted that “dismantling national monuments is unlawful” and vowed to take legal action if needed. Greens are also appalled by Trump’s dramatic rollback of environmental justice initiatives, including disbanding the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council via executive order. “By rolling back efforts to address historic underinvestment and overburden in communities of color and low-income communities, President Trump is putting good health and prosperity out of reach for millions of people,” says Earthjustice president Abigail Dillen. “Earthjustice will keep fighting alongside communities who continue to demand justice.”
Despite these challenges, bipartisan support for clean water and conservation could help counter some rollbacks. Clean energy investments, particularly in red-leaning districts, may also continue due to economic benefits like job creation. Wetzler noted that protecting clean water and natural spaces often transcends political divides. Green groups will rely on public engagement to protect progress made on environmental issues. Individuals can play important roles by staying informed, supporting legal and advocacy efforts and urging lawmakers to protect key environmental policies. By working together, the public can ensure that environmental protections are maintained and strengthened despite the challenges.
CONTACTS: As Trump Targets Environmental Justice, Activists Gear Up for Legal Fights, https://www.sej.org/headlines/trump-targets-environmental-justice-activists-gear-legal-fights.
Dear EarthTalk: Why is the Great Salt Lake shrinking so much and can it be saved? – E.T., via email
Utah’s Great Salt Lake is the largest saltwater lake in the Western Hemisphere. It is a remnant of Lake Bonneville, which dried up 14,000 years ago due to extreme drought. It contributes $1.9 billion annually to Utah’s economy and provides 7,700 jobs. Over 10 million birds rely on this lake for their survival.
Apart from natural fluctuations, the Great Salt Lake’s water level has dropped continuously since 1870, mainly due to the desiccation of the lake in the diversion of upstream water. The Great Salt Lake gets most of its water from the Bear, Weber and Jordan rivers, but now a significant portion of water is being diverted for agricultural and industrial use. Climate change and increase in temperature are also contributing to the Great Salt Lake’s desiccation. Due to temperature increases, the rate of evaporation has also increased, impacting the salinity of the lake. Agriculture dominates water use by 74 percent, nine percent by mineral extraction, nine percent by industrial use and eight percent by evaporation.
“The lake has a lot of social and economic relevance for the region and Utah,” says Siiri Bigalke, a climate scientist at Portland State University who has studied recent volume levels of the Great Salt Lake. Indeed, the cost of the Great Salt Lake drying—including loss of mineral extraction, landscape mitigation costs, the loss of lake recreation and economic value, the loss of brine shrimp, health costs, and impacts to ski resorts—could total as much as $2.17 billion per year. The decline in Great Salt Lake water levels could kill some 6,500 jobs, most of which stem from a loss of mineral extraction output. Researchers say the tax rate in Utah would have to increase by more than 50 percent to make up for these potential losses.
The desiccation of the Great Salt Lake will lead to air and water pollution, a decline in agricultural productivity, loss of industry, and economic devastation. Even if the lake is not completely lost, the shrinkage can expose lakebed sediments containing heavy metals and organic pollutants which could significantly deteriorate air quality.
To save the lake, a minimum streamflow of 2.5 million acre-feet per year must be maintained. Ensuring that river flow remains at or above this threshold is essential for stabilizing the lake’s water levels. Water flow to upstream farms should be limited. Local governments should coordinate with state and federal programs to expand water conservation awareness. You can get involved by creating and sharing media on this issue to raise awareness. Additionally outdoor vegetation should be converted to drought tolerant to conserve water.
CONTACTS: The Aridification of the Great Salt Lake, https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/the-aridification-of-the-great-salt-lake.
Dear EarthTalk: If we’ve had the Safe Drinking Water Act in effect for 50 years already, why are so many municipalities having problems providing safe drinking water? – Mary Ford, New York, NY
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), enacted in 1974 under President Gerald Ford, established the first comprehensive framework for regulating and protecting America’s drinking water supply. This law ensured that the water reaching our homes is free from harmful contaminants and safe for consumption. It also gave the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authority to regulate drinking water contaminants and allow states to take the lead role in enforcing the SDWA. However, despite the SDWA’s provisions, many communities in the U.S. face challenges maintaining safe drinking water. Enforcement challenges and new pollutants have contributed to ongoing problems in water quality across these municipalities.
The SDWA, despite its successes, has struggled to keep pace with evolving challenges. Responsibility for enforcing the SDWA falls to state governments who have raised large concerns about environmental justice. Studies indicate that racial, ethnic and socioeconomic factors influence enforcement with under-resourced minority communities facing greater challenges in maintaining compliance with SDWA standards. These disparities are exacerbated by limited access to state and federal environmental programs like the SDWA, leaving vulnerable populations affected by contaminated drinking water. “In low-income communities, in Black communities and tribal communities, they’re more worried about their water than most folks,” says Julian Gonzalez, senior legislative counsel for the environmental group Earthjustice.
Increased contaminants in drinking water also pose challenges. Researchers conducted a study to evaluate private well water quality in Maryland, and analysis revealed that nearly half of the tested wells failed federal health-based drinking water standards. Since almost 44.5 million people across the U.S. rely on private wells, water testing and well maintenance could be required for public health safety. Additionally, studies conducted in Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin reported that around half of their private wells exceeded the SDWA contaminant standards. For municipalities to begin ensuring safer water for their citizens, regular monitoring of private wells and assessments of the water quality are needed.
Today, it is important to support policies that prioritize stricter regulations of the SDWA, and engage in efforts to protect our natural water resources from contamination. Individuals can participate in efforts to reduce pollution by disposing of hazardous waste properly and conserving water. “There’s just been a lot of real progress in terms of requirements, minimum standards, monitoring that is required, the collection of data…We just know a lot more about our water sources, where we get our water from,” Gonzales says.
CONTACTS: 50th Anniversary of the Safe Drinking Water Act: Why Isn’t Drinking Water Safer? https://www.nrdc.org/bio/erik-d-olson/50th-anniversary-safe-drinking-water-act-why-isnt-drinking-water-safer?
Dear EarthTalk: Are the Chinese actually way ahead of U.S., European and Japanese automakers regarding EVs? And are we ever going to see Chinese cars on American roads? – P.L., via email
China has quickly become a dominant force in the global electric vehicle (EV) market, surpassing car makers in the U.S., Europe and Japan. Western car companies used to be the leaders in innovation, but Chinese car makers have surged ahead recently, producing affordable, high-tech EVs at record speed. This has raised concerns in the U.S. about whether Chinese automakers will soon enter the American market and how that could affect domestic car companies. With growing competition and trade tensions, the question remains: Are Chinese EVs really ahead? And will they ever make it onto American roads?
One of the main factors that brings China’s EV success is robust government support. For years, China has offered substantial subsidies, tax incentives and infrastructure investments to enhance EV sales and manufacturing. China also has control over a large part of the worldwide battery supply chain, which provides its car makers an edge regard to cost and access to crucial components. Firms such as BYD, Nio and XPeng have emerged as global leaders, providing EVs that are not only less expensive than Western options, but also equipped with advanced technology. These elements enable China to sell its EVs globally, surpassing American and European car makers in both production scale and cost-effectiveness.
Although they’ve achieved global success. Chinese EVs still face hurdles to enter the U.S. market. High tariffs increase the cost of export, and persistent geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China further complicates trade. Concerns also exist about cybersecurity and intellectual property. As some lawmakers suggest, vehicles made in China may pose a security threat due to their sophisticated data collection and connectivity capabilities. Additionally, American car makers and lawmakers have opposed permitting Chinese competition, worrying it might undermine local EV manufacturing and lead to job reductions.
Because of these barriers, some Chinese carmakers are looking at different ways to enter the market. One possible strategy is making EVs in Mexico, whereby they’d benefit from the USMCA trade agreement and potentially avoid some tariffs. Others might partner with Western brands to supply batteries or technology, which would let them compete in a more indirect way. Many American EVs already have Chinese components, so even without full vehicle imports, China still plays a big role in the U.S. industry.
Competition between China and Western automakers is likely to get more intense. U.S. and European governments are giving more subsidies for domestic EV production, trying to close the gap. But if China keeps expanding fast, it may be really hard for Western automakers to catch up. Whether or not Chinese EVs show up in American dealerships, their influence on the global car industry can’t be denied.
CONTACTS: How China’s EV Industry Gained an Edge Over the West – World Economic Forum
weforum.org/stories/2024/06/China-electric-vehicle-advantage/.
Dear EarthTalk: How is wind power doing in the U.S.? Is Trump going to harm it? – P.K. via email
Wind energy is the largest single source of renewable energy in the U.S., comprising 10 percent of the nation’s electricity mix. In Iowa and South Dakota, wind provides more than half the electricity. In 2024, U.S. wind electricity generation surpassed coal-fired generation in March and April, as wind power generally produces more electricity in the springtime. Over the course of 2024, the wind industry avoided 351 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions—equivalent to 61 million cars worth of emissions.
The wind industry is also a major job creator. According to the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE), 131,000 people are employed directly in the sector, with more than 300,000 jobs supported overall. “Wind turbine technician” is the fastest growing job in the country, likely to increase by 44 percent over the next decade. The industry has attracted $330 billion in investment over the past 20 years.
Small wind turbines are emerging as key players in the growing distributed wind market, which generates electricity for on-site, local needs. In 2022, DoE estimated that distributed wind could meet half of U.S. electricity demand, offering communities rate stability. They are particularly valuable in rural areas, where water conservation needs make thermal generators less desirable. Innovation continues to drive the wind industry. In 2024, the Massachusetts-based Pecos Wind Power won a $200,000 award to bring the PW85, an 85-kilowatt small wind turbine, to market. The PW85 is designed to maximize efficiency in low-wind conditions, reducing costs by 55 percent compared to similar projects. Its installation process requires no crane and takes just a week instead of the usual six, further cutting costs and expanding wind energy’s reach.
Despite these advancements, the wind industry faces political challenges. On January 24, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order halting approvals, permits and loans for new wind energy projects on federal lands or waters. The order prohibits the development of the Lava Ridge Wind Project, a large wind farm in Idaho that the Biden administration approved in December. The administration justified the orders by citing wind energy’s supposed unreliability and potential harm to wildlife, particularly whales, despite no specific evidence linking offshore wind to whale deaths.
This executive order raises concerns about long-term investment in wind. Developers may hesitate to invest due to high political risk. Francis Pullaro, president of RENEW Northeast, an association of energy industry and environmental advocates, notes that “there’s a lot of uncertainty now as to how all this is going to be implemented.” The potential rollback of projects could slow the country’s transition to renewable energy and weaken progress made in reducing carbon emissions.
CONTACT: Wind power facts, https://cleanpower.org/facts/wind-power/.
Dear EarthTalk: Can we do a better job repurposing outdated technology instead of recycling or trashing it? -- R.T Smith, via e-mail
The annual production of “e-waste”—electronic products that have reached the end of their useful life and tossed—is rising by 2.6 million tons globally, on track to reach 82 million tons by 2030. While recycling is often viewed as the best solution for managing e-waste, it is a complex and costly requiring substantial resources, specialized equipment, and energy to process hazardous materials. A more sensible alternative is repurposing the technology through practices like IT Asset Disposition. By refurbishing devices, we can conserve resources and achieve financial savings—all while extending the lifespan of technology.
Repurposing technology preserves critical materials like minerals and metals, otherwise often extracted at a significant environmental cost. Redistributing components within a company instead of making new ones saves time and resources—and extends hardware life. “The more metals we recycle, the fewer have to be mined,” says Kees Baldé, senior scientific specialist at the UN Institute for Training and Research.
Dell, HP, Microsoft, Apple, Lenovo, Cisco, Google, Amazon and Sony all have programs to take back and find new homes for outdated tech hardware. Also, TechSoup, Good360 and Computers with Causes are non-profits which specialize in redistributing refurbished tech to charitable organizations.
E-waste is one of the fastest-growing waste streams, yet less than a quarter is properly recycled. E-waste contains substances like lead, mercury and cadmium, which can leach into soil and water supplies and are linked to neurological, respiratory and developmental disorders, particularly in vulnerable populations.
Beyond environmental advantages, repurposing technology saves money by selling or trading in old devices through eBay or manufacturer trade-in programs. Leasing arrangements also provide access to updated technology sans frequent disposal. With creativity, you can DIY old devices into something completely new, like a tablet into a digital recipe book or an old laptop into a home media server.
The EU’s “Right-to-Repair” laws highlight this trend: “We expect Council to adopt their position soon, so we can begin negotiations to transform these measures into law and pave the way for a truly circular European economy,” European Parliament member Rene Repasi shares. With less than a quarter of e-waste recycled properly globally, adopting a thrifty mindset can drive real change. As a consumer, choose to donate or repurpose outdated devices can conserve resources, save money, and reduce environmental impact. In our technology-dependent world, this shift isn’t simply beneficial—it’s essential.
CONTACT: Electronic Waste Rising Five Times Faster than Documented E-waste Recycling, https://ewastemonitor.info/the-global-e-waste-monitor-2024/.
Dear EarthTalk: Are prairie dogs threatened or endangered these days? – Joseph P., via email
Prairie dogs play a key role in grassland ecosystems but encounter many threats. These cute 18” tall tan rodents live in small pockets of habitat across 10 western U.S. states: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming. However, they are now extinct in Arizona. Roughly half of the U.S. population is in South Dakota, Montana and Wyoming. As keystone species —those whose presence is critical for the balance and health of their ecosystems— they support more than 130 other species such as burrowing owls and black-footed ferrets.
Habitat loss is one of the most noteworthy threats. Urban development, agriculture and land conversion have dramatically reduced habitats. This leaves fragmented areas that make it hard for populations to thrive. Climate change further compounds thing by altering grassland ecosystems: Rising temperatures and prolonged droughts reduce food and water availability, further impacting prairie dogs and the species that depend on them. “Everything that was in the southern part of their range is kind of lopped off, and you’re really seeing almost Colorado become the central core part of their range and then shifting north,” says Sterling Krank, Prairie Dog Coalition Director at The Humane Society of the United States.
Another challenge is sylvatic plague, a disease transmitted by fleas that has wiped out large colonies. Also, prairie dogs are viewed as pests by farmers and ranchers. This leads to poisoning and other eradication efforts. “Prairie dogs, once one of the most abundant animals on the prairie, now occupy two percent of their historic range,” reports Christine Peterson in High Country News.
Prairie dogs aren't federally recognized as endangered. But activists are working to conserve them, launching a wide range of initiatives including habitat restoration, vaccination efforts against the plague, and public awareness programs. These initiatives have brought achievements. But difficulties remain.
Anybody can help safeguard prairie dogs and their habitat. Supporting groups such as Defenders of Wildlife and the Prairie Dog Coalition aids in financing habitat restoration and disease prevention initiatives. Promoting sustainable methods that protect grasslands and reduce human-wildlife conflicts is another way to help. Raising awareness about the ecological importance of prairie dogs and taking part in citizen science initiatives to track their populations are additional methods to help in their conservation.
Prairie dogs may not hold endangered status at the moment, but their decreasing populations and the dangers they encounter highlight the necessity for intervention. Assisting conservation efforts and adopting sustainable methods is one approach to help guarantee the survival of these species and uphold the balance of North America's grassland ecosystems.
CONTACT: Conservation Efforts for Prairie Dogs, https://www.prairiedoghoogland.com/conservation.
Dear EarthTalk: What is the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) and why is it in jeopardy with Trump taking office for a second term? -- B. Jackson, Washington, DC
NZBA is a partnership of banks dedicated to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The Alliance was assembled in 2021 by the U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP) and plays an important role in discouraging the use of fossil fuels, especially throughout the financial sector. Recently, six major U.S. banks have left the NZBA: Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. The future of the NZBA is now in question.
Over the past few years, American involvement in the NZBA has been targeted by right-wing politicians. In 2022, antitrust court cases led by Republican attorneys general demanded that some U.S. banks leave NZBA. In November of 2024, a group of states led by Texas sued BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard for embracing pro-climate policies, leading the banks to withdraw from the Alliance.
Trump’s re-election seemingly influenced the banks’ decisions. His policies are anti-climate, and many experts believe the banks caved under pressure from the White House. Patrick McCully, a senior analyst at Reclaim Finance, a French non-profit, says that the banks “don’t want to be the subject of social media rants, and their CEOs don’t want to be yelled at in congressional committees.”
The Alliance is certainly weakened without the major American banks. That said, the NZBA still has a strong global influence with 141 members. Experts are hoping that the European banks, which make-up a majority of the Alliance, will coordinate global climate-friendly initiatives. “If recalcitrant actors are no longer in the cohort, I would hope the initiative could be more ambitious and ensure its membership will do what is required by bringing all financing activities into line with climate goals,” says Will van de Pol, the CEO of the Australian company Market Forces.
Although no longer a part of the alliance, some U.S. banks have announced that they remain dedicated to climate-friendly initiatives. “We remain committed to reaching net zero and continue to be transparent about our progress,” commented a spokesperson from Citigroup. Although the NZBA is weaker without the six major American banks, there is hope that efforts to reach net-zero emissions will remain a priority worldwide. The best way to promote the goals of the NZBA during its uncertain future is by choosing to use banks that have chosen to remain part of the Alliance.
CONTACTS: Where do big-name U.S. departures leave the Net-Zero Banking Alliance? https://www.thebanker.com/Explainer-Where-do-big-name-US-departures-leave-the-Net-Zero-Banking-Alliance-1736251396.
EarthTalk® is produced by Roddy Scheer & Doug Moss for the 501(c)3 nonprofit EarthTalk. See more at https://emagazine.com. To donate, visit https://earthtalk.org. Send questions to: question@earthtalk.org.
Add Comment